Egypt Diesel Injector 0414720404 Order: Quantity Photography and Product-Label Verification
Real Order Case | Egypt | Volvo/Bosch Series | 4 Units
An Egyptian customer confirmed an order for four units of injector OE 0414720404 for repair replacement.
The buyer requested a photograph showing the full quantity and verification that the injector body reference matched the packaging label.
Confirmed Order Details
| Item | Information |
| Market | Egypt |
| OE reference | 0414720404 |
| Product series | Volvo/Bosch |
| Application note | Volkswagen/Audi |
| Quantity | 4 units |
| Purchase purpose | Repair replacement |
| Verification request | Full-quantity photograph and matching references |
Why Product and Box References Matter
The injector body reference and packaging label should be compared against the approved purchase specification.
If the visible identifiers differ, the discrepancy should be investigated before the goods are treated as the agreed product.
A label match can support product identification, but it does not independently prove authenticity or functional quality.
Application Information Requires Confirmation
The source record lists Volvo/Bosch as the product series and Volkswagen/Audi as the application note.
These descriptions should not be combined into an unverified compatibility claim. The intended engine configuration and exact product reference must be checked against suitable technical documentation.
Quantity Verification
A photograph of the four prepared units can help the buyer review the visible quantity before shipment.
However, a photograph does not establish every product's internal condition or prove that a functional test has been completed.
If inspection evidence is required, the relevant scope should be defined separately.
Confirmed Order Result
The Egyptian transaction was confirmed for four units of OE 0414720404.
The customer's requirements focused on full-quantity photography and consistency between the injector marking and packaging label.
The source does not establish the actual photograph, a final dispatch date, or completed repair results.
Conclusion
This Egypt order demonstrates the value of clear product identification and quantity checks in repair-parts procurement. Visual evidence can support order review, while compatibility and functional performance require separate verification.